Perfection has a common fallacy when it comes to nature and the process of evolution. It falls into niches. Which in reality always ends up in a twist of fate to be the single most common natural source of extinction on this planet. Oddly humans seem to think that they are excluded from this strange justice of nature.
Allow me to clear a few things up regarding the concept of niches. First , most important thing to understand is they are not a fallacy of primitive organisms. what i mean is, niches are not an indicator of failed biological progression. On the contrary they are the purest expression of life's perfection when an organism becomes singularly dependent on one.
niches are most of the time an element of ecology that is present in the environment that is not being overly exploited by the greater biomass. They spell the life and death of a species.some of them are subtle in a way .
examples of animals and their niches:
ruminating animals such as the cows and other multi-stomach creatures:
they are amazing animals. literally. when the ice age hit hard, there was very little by way of vegetation that was rich in needed sustenance. so, the ruminating animals devised this incredible multiple digestive system that can find even the trace elements in pine needles and other dead vegetation. these animals can extract the most minute amounts of food from the barest of sources. it stuns me how they managed to do this, maintaining a body temperature at more then half of the energy we require to stay warm and still are massive compared to us.
sharks:
are by far one of the most excellent designs of the progress of life.they are in a niche. requiring flesh from fresh kills. although not widely dependent on a single type of prey source, they nonetheless dominate pretty much every type of niche environmentally in the ocean.in every type of climate. but what really defines them as a niche example is the fact that they have the electromagnetic sensor nerves. it displays an important aspect of where they originated from. they were as some still are, bottom dwellers. they developed the ability to sense animals under the sand. the hammerhead, is explicitly made for this purpose. but they are not so much at a loss, provided the main source of their niche is not gone. that is coral reefs.
coral reefs demonstrate explicitly the validity of how niches can spell the beginning and the end of species. niches are extremely powerful movers in the evolutionary process.
the perfect example, is the celeocanth. an ancient fish that was recently discovered in the early 1900's to still exist. the significance is that the fish is clearly a coral reef remnant from about 280 million years ago. the reefs it lived in died out, from probably super volcano activity messing up the environment for the reefs and they live in deep trenches now. totally displaced by the need for survival.
another less obvious example of niches and the importance of understanding them is the medical science and its approach to killing the virus/bacterial parasites and diseases in our bodies. the quest is based on the fact that most of the prevalent diseases are so complex in their niches that if we can solve the required necessity we can pretty much wipe them out. however, as a demonstration of the powerful influence of niches and their need towards the organisms survival. malaria is probably one of the best when it comes to disease.the whole host is being manipulated by the malaria to maintain an environment that it can survive in. the fever is the last part of the equation. it makes the person hotter to enable its transfer to another host.
however, humans, we have a strangely unique niche. it exists in our minds. so to speak.originally, we exploited a niche that few animals were choosing to endeavor on. when we were still quadruped and lemur like. we began to seek out the seeds and hard fruits like nuts. traveling and foraging farther away from the trees.largely because the climate was erratic, the soft fruits were not stable enough. flash freezes would destroy the fruits so we were forced out into the landscape.
the world was scary as hell back then. there was the american lion that was very big and cave bears. most of the surviving competitors had super abilities compared to us.but we had advanced social behavior. soon, this would be our saving grace. we , humans, would not exist without our ability to interact and communicate.that is our niche, without it, we would perish. you see, there is nothing else that we have. we don't have claws, we don't have fangs, we are not naturally violent and we cant outrun hardly anything. how did we survive? we created culture.
culture is our niche.this is radical compared to the other animals.most of them were in niches from habitat or readily available food source.
as primates we didn't have this problem. the word primate means that we are pretty much in all ways that matter the same as the lemurs in the beginning of primates branch. we have generalized teeth and are pretty much uninhibited for movement of our limbs.
the niche of culture advanced and reinforced its necessity as strongly as the eucalyptus tree and the koala are bound. it is really all fascinating.bats,snakes,ants,birds (even more specific examples exist in birds), kangaroos, fresh water fish versus salt water and even buzzards are examples of animals that are contained in niches.
and so.... it remains to be seen. will we make it? it is hard to say, the mind or source of the niche is not exactly physically bound. so it remains to be seen if we humans can actually out live and out mode our niche.

yea i took ancient philosophy as an elective. got good marks in it too. the prof actually borrowed some of my material to explain stuff to the class, then regretted it when i informed him he used some of my essay material.
at first, i was as dis-infomercial about philosphy as the rest of you. i just figured it was freelance creative writing and connived it to be an easy mark.
but various facts remain awesome sauce even now years after learning them.
1. it is quite a unifying experience to be clueless as everyone else in the class.
2. facial contortions of a philosophy professor trying to define a simple idea to a brain dead audience beats half the entertainment on present tv.
3. if in doubt fake it pays off greatly in philosophy. in fact the more real one gets, the more wrong they are apparently.
i found myself wondering why they didnt teach us this stuff in preschool. when our child genius was still untainted by hormonal conquests.
remember when we were kids? our comeback, i know you are but what am i?.... apparently it is a valid question that can entail a detailed 7 page essay.
takes one to know one, the usual sidekick to that previous inquest also very valid and apparently remains an ongoing inquiry.
but in all truth, the facts or history of some of the stuff is just awesome to consider.
fun fact numero uno --get this: here we are in modern day , we finally admit that yes, there may be alternate universes. that yes, there is probably one of me, where i am the master jello maker in the universe or my attention to grammar when writing is not only excellent but proof of my internal need to plaster nonsense on the internet with inherit human meaning of profound nature that all i need to do is yell the name 'NORM' and all you nod your head with reverent knowing.
well, actually i am pretty sure we all did when i did that anyways. somethings are universal regardless. my point is though, it can be that if i yell norm and tap dancing pinstriped penguins come parading out of nowhere prancing a Sinatra motif two step that would make Sammy davis giggle is not only probable, it is happening now as we speak.
sure, we all have had the would-shoulda iffa coulda's , meaning that we all have speculated alternate space time stuff. but plato, grande compadre to Socrates had it all figured. he seriously had the whole concept of an alternate universe not only figured out, but even knew the answer as to why we cant have our imagined realities exist here.
bear in mind, this is an ancient Athenian. things like the concept of a world, in the idea of being a planet were alien and unimaginable, apparently the concept of omnipotent beings with harsher character flaws then a pack of drunken french mimes were a more likely prospect and sheep guts were a way to get the numbers to the next regional lottery.but imagine that in the time when zeus was believed to shoot lighting bolts at stuff, this guy plato had figured and deduced not only that there is an alternate universe but the friggin physics of it as well.
you could say, the earth goes around the sun and those lights are other suns , he would have accused you of heresy, but if you said, there is a mirror universe where everything is perfect and because it is perfect can never exist here. he would have agreed with no question.
he had worked out why doing things with no expectations was not only a good way to maintain a healthy outlook, but the whole mechanics behind it all. the reason was because he couldn't understand why shit went wrong in the world. the old, if there is a god why do little children not get their own private jet axiom we all have used when confronted by earnest biblewhacking borg. he said that we all picture the perfect object. that for instance, kraft dinner mixed with tuna is perfection, whereas kraft with extra cheese is still perfection. in other words, i can say the word chair and we all visualize a chair in our minds, which even know are different for both us, still are perfect. but because we have our individual perfect objects which we recognize from the alternate universe, when we attempt to recreate it in this one, it is destined to be faulty. he said, it will always fail.
the truth is, that is exactly the problem qauntum theory is trying to solve now.
in the present science , we know that there is alternate universes with alternate versions of everything, but if they exist here, they fail and collapse. that whole antimatter thing actually revolves around speculation of what happens when one of these type of things is introduced into this realm. the agreed on result, it cancels out the matter and they both cease to exist.
so, in effect plato, an anceint Athenian had figured out quantum space/time mechanics.
next fun fact takes a bit of explaining:
first: this guy named thales, who was total awesomnosity that he is claimed to be the progenitor of the science itself, belived that that which creates , moves. literally, the thing which created the universe ,the constructor or building blocks, must move. he used magnets to demonstrate and show the energy of the creator in action.why is this awesomesauce?
in modern times, we have figured that the big bang is what made everything. even more incredible, it started off with positive ions mostly of hydrogen. we know this because we can see the stars that existed near the beginning with our telescopes. the earth, is active. it has a iron core. when two metals are placed together cool stuff happens, like duracell bunny whacking drums and other electronics happen. it is caused by the metals and the electromagnetic proprties creating an electric force.things like heat energy and whatnot begin. it is what creates lava and is reason electric stoves work. (the atoms of the impure metal on stoves cause friction as the electricity surges through.this causes a massive amount of entrophy and is released in heat energy and light.
so, thales, worked out the big bang, arichimedes comes into picture now. he stated that what we see is not there. borrowing from thales, he not only saw everything in motion but stated that since everything is moving , it isnt really there.we only percieve it is there. that we can only know for sure that the object we see is truly there by nearing it and actually touching it.
he had figured out relativity.
an ancient athenian had worked out what einstien had deduced , before the idea of time and space was even existing.
this other guy, who forget the name of then worked out that the only way anything comes into existence was with chaos. he said that heat and cold and other stuff were separate forces and that they have to combine in a massive chaos to create matter.
lastly for the conversation, is pythagoras, who was in love with numbers, because like plato he understood that numbers are something that lives in the world but can never be seen. in otherwords, the number three exists and we recognize it, but we can not find it anywhere in nature.
so he said: that the world is made of incredible small nothings and that these nothings combine and create matter. he figured out atoms.
it stunned me. these ancient men, had such incredible modern thoughts. they had solved the mystery of the universe, with pure human intelligence. science didn't even exist then. stunning stuff really.

 knocking at my door. i answer. 'have you been received into the kingdom of god?'.
instead of the usual inquiry as to how these nuts got into the building and don't they know by law they need permission from the owners of the building to come in and propaganda their dredge , i decide that heck i am game. my mistrust for these types is well founded. when i was derelict and on the street as they were in warm clothes ,seeing me freezing and exhausted fighting the cold minus sub zero temperatures.they would offer me two dollars for the privilege of hearing how apparently when i die, i will be saved. never extending the uniquely human quality of a warm place to sleep.just enough for a coffee ,so that i can artificially stimulate more Adrenalin into my system ,in order to try and stay awake in the sub zero, hopefully not to freeze to death.this is the type of reality i am used to.thankfully, my mind and my human self got to the better of me and i am no longer there. however, the decades of living this way has had it's effect.the context in which a street person meets these people is drastically different then normally well adjusted people.
  but anyways, i recognize them as opponents in my rational thought.it seems, that their main purpose is to somehow find a way to disturb a persons reality.place some form of doubt.somehow make them unsure.
unfortunately for them i am quite comfortable in my perception of reality.i have no real serious flaws in my understanding.i owe this to science and basic common sense. it is funny really, but the witticism of mark twain or the words of ancient philosophers,simple men and women who applied their gift of human thought towards understanding the universe in it's own domain is way more effective to contemplate then any derisive slant towards a 'us versus them' mentality. it reminds me of when Socrates was questioned by meletus as to if he was aware that he was negatively influencing the youth of Athens.(basis for his trial). Socrates said, no man intentionally does himself harm. did any of you come to me and inform me at the time that i was affecting the youth?..meletus said no..(i always pictured this sheepish). Socrates said, well, if i didn't know i was doing it how could i correct it? surely, if anyone told me i would certainly have stopped what i was doing. a classic event in that history, it was in that one statement that Socrates actually won the case , though the very logic he used would prove to himself that since he can not stop being himself.no matter where he went, he committed suicide. even when many people begged him to run away.but that is a different topic.
point in that statement is, the religious door to door , crowd hustling fanatics are aware of what they are doing and are intentionally doing the harm. we are supposed to be guaranteed our conscious selves in this country. it means that i have the right to my mind and my thoughts. you can think of it as a religion if you like or a belief system, though i am unsure since thoughts change. however, if for instance i was to go on a door to door traipse, declaring and informing the validity of say human ancestry.odds are i would be picked up and charged with public nuisance. apparently common sense is not protected under the freedom of expression, i would wager that maybe this is why there is very little of it out there.just a theory really..but sounds right.
  so i calmly asked them what their thoughts on evolution are. the lady said, authoritative, it doesn't explain what created life.
'i said, well, i don't remember Darwin ever claiming that he discovered the thing that created life,i think he did what newton did , basically demonstrated the nature of the thing we know of as life. the process of it. so i don't know why that would be related to my question.well, she said, people think it is the answer to what created life.
(i am biting my tongue at this point. considering the hard time that religion has given the theory of evolution and the amazing manipulation of the public's mind and ego towards not fully accepting or even understanding what Darwin really did. it is no mystery that the majority think that evolution is the answer to what created life... actually the answer to that is more into chemistry, seeing as how for instance the Saturn moon titan can create complex biochemical compounds in it's atmosphere, simply by having a methane atmosphere and the act of the solar radiation (plus other geomagnetic stuff). it was actually proven in a laboratory experiment that this can happen. has been falsifiable, which means it can be done over and over again by different laboratories).
nah i hold my tongue.instead i am looking at these people.they are wearing clothes that are largely synthetic in nature.probably made of rayon.wearing glasses, which contradicts what their supposed god creature intended for them to experience life as.
i ask them what they know about ancient humans, explaining that i am an anthropology student. they start telling me about the Egypt and what not.i hold my hand up, that is history, i am talking about the Neanderthals or hominids.
they had no soul. really? i said, that is interesting.so only humans have souls? yes they say. i go so only black people have souls? they looked at me silent.well yea, last year they found out that pretty much every human , outside of Africa, has Neanderthal in them. something like 4 or 6 percent. that means we are hybrids and black people are real humans.therefore we have less soul then them.
they were visibly disturbed and i didn't want to give up the game just yet, so i said but to be honest, genetics remains something of a swiss army knife towards what it is applied. for instance, mtdna, has no Neanderthal in it, but there is homo erectus.so, it depends on your preference, since most of the Asian population has remnants of erectus in the skeletal system in modern times, it seems more likely. sides i don't believe the out of africa theory. too many questions remain for that to be the answer.
i could see they were getting uncomfortable and i had to take the opportunity. so i asked a question.
do you like the sound of someone grinding their nail across a blackboard? (notice how even you shuddered at the memory?..don't worry so did i while writing it). yes , of course said the lady...who i gathered was the 'educated' one. why?.
well, it is just that the reason we don't like it and shudder is because it is a instinctual response that is programmed in us from when we were still pack animals probably not even fully primate..could possibly go farther back then that. some zoologists once did a study of sounds that a multitude of pack animals make when a predator is around, compared the decibel and other sound qualities.turns out they are the same. so, as much as we think we are all that and more, apparently at heart we are still herd or pack animals that react to another species danger call. it happens unconsciously and is instinctive. which, if we go with the 'in his image' idea, means that his image is certainly a single celled organism or some microscopic variation thereof. then i said, coolly, i am sorry but i have a hard time thinking that the amazing beauty of this awe inspiring universe is the result of a microscopic single celled organism.since i can go back, quite effectively, and show (thanks to Darwin and his priceless influence on biology), that is basically where the really relevant roads lead as far as origin.
they grabbed exit and said bless me etc and went on their self justified criminal occupation of disturbing other people's belief systems.
for one small second, i gave those two people a vision of the real universe. scary and beautiful,mysterious and millions of years uneventful.both fast and incredibly slow. the master of all within it's domain. of course i know they are trained through conditioning and self adjustment to have dismissed science, truth which is repeatable for their maladjusted and outdated vision of a ruling dictator/imperialist type of universal structure.oddly, i am just as sad for them as they are for me.

Ooooh lordie you don' know the trouble's i seen. The common caterwaul echoes through the eaves, resounding in a chorus of similar plaints in the court of life. The sudden lapse of the dictation becomes queried by the inhale from the asthma inhaler. then a big breathe and more canter on the done me so wrong they done me so wrong. i leave, thinking that maybe i can get a better story from the rat.
rat? you say or ask? well yea the one that was experimented with the asthma medicine on to make sure that proverbial expulsion of grievous self pity can better resound with better effect. such humility i have for these animals. such incredible beauty lives in these creatures.
seems that they have gotten the rotten end of the deal.
the human mindset, wails about deeds of unfairness and wrongness. a mild inquiry usually turns up that they were expecting something and having not gotten it suddenly have this all bearing knowing of the universe. which is funny in its own way, after all wouldn't that mean the universe revolves around humans and their deranged self rewarding sense of morality?
news to me , different topic , different day.
but rats! now rats..what about them .. well lets see..
first things first, probably the very first mammalian species on the planet earth would be a monotreme type of rat. Mammals for those that are significantly religiously challenged when it comes to truth about the universe are the starting point to what would eventually become us. yep, you see, that would explain this whole experiment on the rats to see how it works on humans thing began. sorry bub, we got a little rat in all of us.
but they have been around ever so longer then us. such incredible creatures. truly befitting for the start of the whole warmblooded types.
they have this ability that completely outdoes us, probably is the reason they have managed to stick around. they can change their whole social behavior system depending on the size of their colony. when it is a small size, they are the typical i am bigger and i can hurt you more type of pecking order. however, when they have a large colony like what you would see in a city , they ditch that. in fact , we cant even figure out conclusively how it works in this setting. we just know , it is changed and changed drastically. wouldn't it be great if we could do that?
Any ways, back to the whiner who now is talking about how they done one single thing wrong and now they are branded for life, with the back up singers exploiting the wrongness for their own benefit.
rats, have been screwed over by something that is not even their fault. to wit, i bet if i went up to a dog , and said hey ..want some fleas? the proposed answer is probably easy to surmise. the rats, well they had mites. from china of all places. we can get lice. should we condemn the children in school getting for lice?
well , these mites gave us the plague, the church tried to capitalize on it by selling prearranged plots in their utopia, for a few family heirlooms which will be lost forever, long after the true reason for the plague is discovered. so , you can bet that would be a new stanza in the they did me wrong dept. funny i have yet to see anyone reclaim any family heirloom as a result of the exploitation of the plague. But that was long ago i hear in the back....if that was so long ago then why the hell do we think of rats as diseased and plagued?
technically it is the mites and technically the rats had nothing to do with it. not really. probably be better to blame the church for it's inept method of dealing with pandemics. lets see, church: whip your self for punishment of sins that are being bestowed upon you by the imaginary being of your choice. thereby opening the sores to the air and making yourself and everyone more susceptible versus rats: not really a seagoing creature hitching a ride on a merchant boat because it had it's favorite food , grain , only to be accosted by the Chinese mite and then finally find land and breaking free from the boat and running off to establish a foothold for re population.
so we have , the most amazing species of mammal. rodentii, the progenitor to everything including ourselves demonstrating what a resourceful and incredibly resilient animal it is. versus hairless apes with screwed up communication and belief systems.
rats, they got it bad. they have been the source for everything that makes your life so luxury. but do they get recognition?
the whole we are more advanced versus them crap doesn't wash. they are primitive , which means they haven't changed much from their original forms. it means, they didn't have to, which means they , like a shark, are pretty much a excellent design of nature. we? well... we have to use rats to make our nature tolerable.
personally we should erect a statue for the unabashed heroism of every lab rat that existed and not worship cosmonaut monkeys that scribble nonsensical crayon on paper. it is my opinion really, they were not volunteers for the greater human good. they were caged and exploited as commodity. the worse thing is, they sell them for food for pythons. so, basically this amazing creature , who had mastered the cold and winter, to get away from giant snakes that can only live in temperate or tropical climates is now being fed to the snakes in glass cages for sicko voyeurism.
the only place they would probably meet up with one naturally on any common basis is probably in the desert. (kangaroo rats have that on a equal terms. at least it is a fair fight)
but fairness and humans when it comes to rats doesn't seem to be the case.
so i sit by the rat, i listen to its wisdom, it knows, it really knows. i can feel it's pain and understand its sense of the blues. i can think of no other creature that has gotten the rough end of destiny .

The story of plants has always been a favorite of mine. i kind of like the way the whole thing plays out. though i , myself am not a plant aficionado. i get by with recognizing that it has leaves and is rooted in the ground. it works for me. however, the history of plants is probably better then any crusade epic we can hope for in the movies. This is a truth many people are not aware of.
the first thing that should always be mentioned about plants is, well, there would be pretty much notta heck of a lot going on without them. As modern humans we are well aware of the rainforest and its contribution to the perseverance of life on this planet. the oxygen we have is vastly produced by that miraculous spot. though of recent note it has been suggested the amazon one is only around roughly a few hundred thousand years old. however, this occupational tendency of the plants has been found in the fossil record to be even 15million years old in some places of the earth.places we would hardly even expect to find a palm tree or pretty much anything plant wise save a shrub have at times been just as dense as the rainforest.
this minor fact alone brings fascinating revelations about the rainforest we know in our lifetimes. it is a massive group of trees that evolved a strategy after the advent of the mammals and started to mass populate in south America for reasons which remain unknown. As always one cant rule out super volcanoes. they are quite the common feature of the earth. yet at any rate these magnificent lifeforms had somehow preserver where a vast majority didn't in a relatively short span of time.
with that, one can easily see how the production of oxygen is secondary , considering that about two thirds of life on earth is contained within the confines of this forest.this, is the first huge legacy of plants. they are the anchor for all other life and all of life is in some way connected to plants.
I guess most people would shut the book there and marvel at their philodendron questioning if it needs water. but there is a deeper story. a story of intrigue and drama. when the plants first came on land, roughly just before the devonian. there was literally no valid atmoshpere and no way any animal could survive. it was incredibly hot and well , temperatures had this strange way of dropping real fast at night. the atmosphere of the earth was not like it is today. the sun's thermal energy would just dissipate into the air and pretty much vanish. it is the way gases work.
plants, some pretty strange looking ones by our standards began their migration on land in a really harsh environment. it wasn't as stable as the water. but, unique only to plants they have a cell that has a hard wall. literally, like an armor. this is why plants cant bend as easily as we can. this provided an excellent way to survive many things such as the uv radiation from a different atmosphere which existed back then.
they provided a new gas. oxygen and refined impurities from the air as they began their domination. there was a time when the entire earth was pretty much a huge forest. there was absolutely nothing on earth at that time animal wise , on land. it was like this for millions of years too. things were going pretty good for them.
they had found their safety zone. as it was a different story in the oceans. insects and fish and pretty much everything non plant were busy gobbling up any plant matter they could find. in fact, the whole predator/prey thing came about from animals eating plants and predators eating animals that eat plants in order to gain the sustenance that plants offered. so directly or indirectly, all life on earth is dependent and connected to plant life for food and any other additional nourishment.vegetation was the next best thing to sliced bread.
as the dominion of the plants went through its motions, the gases they released began to create a blanket of heavy oxygen and carbon monoxide . this created an as yet unheard of effect. greenhouse. the temperatures stayed relatively stable in the massive forests and the insects, being coldblooded had found their way to get on land. needless to say the exploitation of the new world they encountered was beyond imagining. the battle between insects and plants to this day is probably one of the most complex and strangely harmonic dances of survival between two different life forms.
things went like this heavily till the amphibians and then reptiles came into being.now the real contest began. the dinosaurs were pretty much huge lawnmowers only they could eat pretty much anything plant wise when it came to the plant eaters. the idea we are looking at here is massive groups of plant eaters about the size of a truck or bus even in packs so dense they could be seen as a black shadow on the ground if viewed from a far distance. roving over the landscape and eating every single plant they could find.
we know this because that is why some had long necks, as the ones that were closer to the ground had pretty much cleared out the lower leaves. plants began a strategy that is still in effect today. they realized that poison was hopeless against reptiles because reptiles were quite adaptable and far ranging. so they began to create tannins. which were a unique concept . instead of poison they made the animal think that the plant was not nourishing enough. an example is caffeine. it causes the adrenalin to secrete in the system artificially, which causes lack of concentration and excessive stomach acid to happen. the jerky feeling and highly reactive state causing super stress in the animal. the digestion was hastened by the sped up metabolism and the result was the body just didn't recognize it as a valid source of food.
this worked magnificently for a long time. but the grass lands had a different tact.
they decided to make them self look different. by applying bright colors and camouflage. they became flowers.
this worked pretty good too for a short while. till insects, like bees began to exploit the ease of recognizing individual plant types by the color spectrum.
the war between plants and animals is full of plot twists and constant balance. but the truth is, without them, just existing. not as food but just existing, life would not exist as it does.
so, hug a tree , they deserve our recognition.

Just so we are clear, this was written by an eccentric human and any resemblance to the meanderings of an not yet erect ape species that has the name of a popular toffee candy we used to get as kids is purely coincidental and shall be forthwith ignored.
good that is out of the way. always nice to have the disclaimers at the beginning.
so, today lets talk about the other people. cause that is usually how it works isn't it? it is only the other people who for instance are less evolved. This is what i hear. news to me really.
i always find that statement quite intriguing too, cause i quickly rationalize in my mind as to what exactly is more evolved in the speaker that entitles them to be the spokesperson for all other greater evolved people.
it gets confusing. as it should. if you are like me, you begin to wonder what it is they are ahead of in the road of evolution , the most elastic property of life known on earth and since they have this universal knowledge, can my feeble human mind even conceive of it or understand?
i choose to live dangerously. i ask what does this particular person mean.( i find the specifics change from person to person but the general consensus remains fairly intact.)
apparently , according to the more advanced and therefore higher form of human, those of us who aren't evolved do not understand that we must obey the gravity of the informers model of the universe.this, is the great quest of the human genome, to obey the wishes of the more advanced and evolved person.
it is all i can understand from the various reports. took some deduction though, i notice that when these highly advanced and therefore superior humans speak and talk about the less evolved , it is when they didn't get their way. so i am pretty sure that is the key evolutionary quest, according to the higher state people.
since anthropology is my thing and i am always the dutiful servant to it, i inquire as to what a more evolved person versus a non or apparently the rest of us must strive to have in our generation genetic tradeoff.
why not? i mean we all need goals.
apparently people do not know how to listen. well, hell, i could tell you that. doesn't mean they are less evolved.usually a chorus of i know what i am talking about and they are all misled follows.
the funny thing is, i am saying that all the time about people, i begin to actually wonder if i am more evolved. i dismiss this, how can i be more evolved? where is my genetic path going? more importantly do i have any say in it?
still, ever dutiful and wanting to learn what the greater being has to say so that i can pass it amongst my fellow lesser evolved types in the hopes of remedying the problem spur me on. i ask what is it they don't listen to?
A whole spiel of vitamin therapy and homeopathic stuff comes out. Aha i think to myself , a witchdoctor!
you don't see them much anymore, what with the lesser evolved people creating this highly sophisticated thing called medicine and science to eliminate what is fact or fiction.
i shrug, too each their own.
it turns out the greater evolved people are apparently sworn by some invisible agency of mind to make us humans more dependent on cockamamie snake oil tonics and cream of some animal oil grease topical smears .
why are you telling me this , i ask.
you are different mark, you are intelligent. i know you understand.i do?? ..oh ..i do!
i understand more then they can possibly know.
first the preoccupation of the social realm towards the idea of being more evolved is no different then a parent telling a kid to act it's age.
second this whole us versus them thing is a symptom of oxytocin addiction. (as it is released through natural bonding in groups).
then a mess load of things can be listed out till the final relevant item. this person needs help.