May 24, 2013
-
where steven greer is going wrong
steven greer is an interesting figure in the foyer of the ‘look at me’ types in the field of ufology. i watched his documentary yesterday called Sirius and was forced to intermittently pause and restart it in an effort to keep my companion both up to date with ideas and to relieve both of us from the shockarama of the visuals he had placed into the video. honestly not much of what he placed in the video visually was actually required or for that matter relevant. this got me curious as to his game. slowly i began to formulate what it is that i recognize as wrong with that vision of the universe. how he portrays the essence of the ufo phenomena is both creepy and fully of mangled dissent. i kept finding myself doing a psyche profile on him every time a section was displayed. he, is troubled. it is obvious.
i mean absolutely no ill vision towards him. but honestly i am thinking of his message. which remains vaguely despot and displaced. with the infomercial mannerisms almost being as comical as a french mime overdosed on both caffeine and passion, you an see the painted face. it is weird. but more to what i see in him is this problem. so i find myself today motivated to speak to steve in the ethernet. i feel this need to explain something to him and you readers.
there was a big mistake made in the 70′s. an agency that represented the divorced advancement of the human race and it’s vision of a grander future committed an act of potential terrorism, both beyond rational perception and beyond any form of rectifying , that we are all forced to just sit and wait.the potential of disaster is beyond anyone’s even my own imagination. we are at the mercy of fate. the agency, was nasa. the act was letting out two deep space probes, named voyager. the conflict is a map and visual description of both our technology state and well, what kind of animal life we are. nasa sent this billboard out without doing the one thing that remains dauntingly serious about this whole potential contact thing . nasa did not ask the earth for permission to place us, humanity, collectively , at risk.
i am sorry, but this is the truth. i have wondered about it since it was done. the only real aspect of it that is worthwhile is that is shows exactly how subterfuge and other aspects of the industrial overlords can be and get away with this. they began popping out strikingly wondrous photos of planets that had been witnessed only by telescope before.rejoiced in new found knowledge and scientific inquiry and pretty much expanded our vision of the universe beyond all satiation. we want more and more. but, you can color a wolf all you want, make it look like an amiable rabbit, the point is, they have placed us at extreme risk. how this plays out, is a matter of time. it always will be, it always was.
i know it sounds dismal, forgive me of that, i am not really a conspiracy dismal type. i merely point out the truth.
so, we have, in one stroke of awe inspiring genius more or less made our footsteps into the cosmos, being careful to keep our footpath clear. which is fine. what is done is done. we have leaped into the ocean with the sharks and we are out of our element. it is what we are best at.
thing is, i think, i feel, i believe that many people including steven greer, have the whole concept wrong. i think that they do not understand how it really works in a universal sense. when, you watch these documentaries and you investigate some of the literature, all you see is conspiracy this and conspiracy that. how apparently so and so did this and big question of that . the vagueness is intended here, because , you see, it means nothing. it is only scared monkeys chattering about the suddenness of lightning. the sudden flash, the sound and the recognizable effect it had on the area of strike. fear and unknowing, lack of control and question of motive. but it is tossed back and forth between us humans. it really goes no further.
david hume once tried to prove existence of god or an alien life (all in how you see it), he created a cast of characters in a thought experiment. there was the skeptic, the believer and the indifferent. he used this to manifest an ability to uncover truths through the logically envisioned chat the characters had. i cant say that he was successful, he had to eventually make an allowance for the idea of faith, which ultimately would hand the winning wreath to the believer and therefore secure the validity of the entities existence. that tv show, ufo hunters, believe it or not, i only watched it once. guess what i saw? hume’s experiment being acted out. that is all.
so, we have monkeys acting out the flash of lightning that was in the savanna. it becomes customized and by doing so, falls into locke’s concept of thought. we eventually claim ownership, individually of the phenomena and the actual event. all of this at first , is an attempt to understand it. but it goes in weird directions when resolution is not found. things go far out of the essence of the actual topic at hand.strange rituals will be made up and nearly neo-aztec sacrifice is made for no real progression, no real understanding, except basically that we are a bunch of monkeys scared of lightning.
i do not doubt that what steve is investigating is scary stuff. that would most certainly be in top order. it is however human stuff. not what it is he and the people that follow potray that they are after. you can see more profound and absolute confirmation for every sinister plot device and action in his story / documentary then you can see about the very subject he is banking on. each and every person he shows, the witnesses all show the same thing. a wall and a barrier, the exclusive assumption that they have seen lighting up close and that they are giving us the lightning.
last i checked, it pretty much does what it wants. the ufo phenomena is of it’s own will and any knowledge or precept is not any single human’s ownership. freewill, is simply that. which is the very real crux of the matter isn’t it? i have read and investigated as much as any civilian can about this subject for more then 30 years, my mother had a book called stranger then fiction, it was my first true introduction into this stuff. i am not a sponge, i assume that you readers aren’t too. that whole like attracts like thing certainly exists with me and people i meet. so what we see is a person who is not getting his way, grouping up with people not getting their way and then putting across the fact that they are special and not getting their way. this is the baseline… i mean no insult, it just is what is there.
i have lived a good part of my life not getting my way. i have even lived a good part of thinking that i was getting my way and discovering that i was wrong about what i thought was the way.the truth is, these people ,these individuals and this whole pseudo -hippy like convention type of meditation is great for psychological therapy, but it is pointless towards any real contact. i question this extremely.
i question how the really mellow wanna be fakir that describes the ability to group and manifest a mob of believers and terrifyingly the later depicted lengthy group of insets of supposedly common worldwide people all proclaiming that they are members of this collective sect. i question it so strongly, that i am compelled to ask what is different about their so called methods and the one shirley mclaine was involved with. indeed, what is any different?
doctor greer, there is a race of humans, that existed in the american south west. they had this person in the tribe that can be found all over the world in different forms of gender or prestige. these people would for their entire life be instructed on how to address the unknown. they would be taught how to investigate the visions of the mind and they more importantly, were given a set of tools on how to deal with any state of consciousness. they are called shamans and these shaman types exist even on the cave paintings in france and you can see the miracle of their knowledge in the way they would attempt to draw human characteristics in the lions.the expression alone being an attempt to contact a deeper intelligence in the nature around them. the way the pictures showed things that only their minds, as complex as they were , could truly understand. the painters or shaman, who were under the intoxicating substance of mind altering drugs when they made these,showed math and science well beyond their potential understanding. if you look, you will see, they had a method and a true ritual for incorporating these images and recognizing what can be deemed only as alien.they commune with the otherworldly as a way of life.
the same can be said from the myth and lore that has traversed down from the ages. the realization of vallez about there being at least a miniature humanoid race that lived or coexisted with humans for some time is both prevalent and ironically an example that i am trying to lead to in my discussion about you. you see steven, there is nothing new here. nothing at all. this is exactly what it is like for millions of years. we are an animal in the savanna. we are still in the savanna. the true context of contact, since before we were even human (sapiens) was as a member of the savanna. to an extraterrestrial race, we are nothing more then an animal in the savanna.
you see, when we sent out voyager one and two, we mistakenly have increased our savanna beyond our scope of understanding. this of course would be quite obvious to anything that finds the probes. the caution displayed by even sharks, one of the most successful animals on earth, is key to how we should be. if there is even a remote possibility that what you and your people are doing is effective, then you should listen to life. it is the most experienced and advanced educator to what to do with alien life. it has had to deal with it since it began to evolve. every strategy ,every change ..everything is a result of that one thing. how to coexist and how to survive.for those who pay attention to such things, the only time an animal life seeks out the commune of another is when it has an upper hand or when to combined effort of both gain upper hand among the others. dogs and cats are self domesticated, we didn’t do it , they did it on their own. they are superior to us in their element as it is, so obviously there was nothing stopping them. we had mastery of agriculture and storage of foodstuff, which attracted rodents , this was easy catch for those two creatures. they slowly incorporated their way of life with ours, in the savanna, in the nature of things.
this, is how contact has to be made. we have to be in our nature. we have to show that we can coexist. it isn’t about who is more aggressive and who is able to do whatever to get the attention on a individual or population level. unfortunately, that is already taken care of, thanks to nasa. if you look into the historical reports of the pretty obvious contact cases, you will find that the beings were only interested in coexisting. it is such a common theme and more prevalent that i am surprised most haven’t figured it out. they, the beings in question themselves have been demonstrating exactly how they wish to interact. heck, even one asked for water to make oatmeal cookies, in prehistory case a japanese emperor met with one, they went hunting together, others just wanna check out some plant life or something. very rarely if at all is anything sinister done. which means that the monkeys are still just fighting over who saw the lightning first when it comes to us.
you have to throw away the ‘ownership’ steven, if you want to achieve your goal. you have to explain it the way it is. not how monkeys around campfires gesture and pose but as a member of the savanna. this is exactly how they, the aliens will and if it is true, should see us. it is after all how we see elephants is it not? they are sentient , so that means nothing to us. we still see them as a member of the african wildlife backdrop. a member of the coexistence of the savanna. which ironically, after sending out the probes, thereby expanding our range of presence beyond comprehension both in space and time, we have made our territory pretty much relatively, exactly there. which will be of interest to any investigating species. how are we faring? what are we showing? are we aware of our actions?
it wont do any good to get involved with the mad monkeys around the campfire, the truth is, it doesn’t matter what black ops bob thinks, the aliens, if they are there, operate way beyond any of our control. just look at the fear the foo fighters created in the world military during ww2 and after. it really has no bearing on them being here or not. what does, what really does , is how are we living, how are we showing that our thoughtless sending of the probes was not a mistake, that given all the screw up and everything that is so messed up about a bunch of homicidal monkeys dancing around a campfire because they didn’t get their way , somehow if given the chance we are ready?
this remains questionable , if the educators that claim to bring the knowledge are too busy showing the monkey business and focusing on ‘that isn’t fair dept’. it is education of earth, as a planet. the understanding of what a planet is. how we affect a planet. how we understand that we can affect other planets. responsibility and the acknowledgement of actions. the recognition of things like ecology and the ability, this is very important steven, to change everything at once, because in the universe, things happen faster then all at once. especially when it comes to the possibility of a space/time travelling population. we have to show that monkeys do exist, but whatever, leave them be.. they will be included anyways. we all live in the savanna.
